|
Drawing of Charley Paddock from Wide World
photograph by C. M. Sexton
Reprint - magazine article: Colliers -
August 1929
"NO SON OF MINE"
by Charley Paddock
"I trust that
no son of mine
will ever be an
amateur Champion,"
briefly expresses this
veteran sprinter's views
on unprofessional sport.
"It's not on the
right track,"
he says

I have waited almost a year to write this article.
Perhaps I should have waited two years and then not
written it. But I do feel that I can sit down now
without prejudice and present a cross-section of amateur
athletic conditions as I have found them. At the
outset, allow me to say this -- that I am a sincere
believer in the benefits which may be derived both
mentally and physically from recreational sports.
If I am ever so fortunate as to have a son, I hope that
he will be interested in athletics, and if he is good
enough to play professionally, I shall not stand in his
way. However, I shall earnestly try to keep him from
being exposed to the petty and penurious evils which
surround the amateur champion today.
For I want him to be honest in his sport relations,
which at present is something virtually impossible in
amateur championship competition. Because
consciously or unconsciously the "Simon pure" amateur who
is a box-office attraction, cashes in upon his name.
All of us do it, in a greater or lesser degree, and
anyone who follows sport closely realizes that this is
true. There are varying degrees of professionalism,
to be sure, from the athlete who "takes it behind his
back" for running a race, to the bright boy who gains
entree to the office of his client by the glamour of the
name that he has gained through "amateur" competition.
To the uninitiated, it might be explained that
virtually every runner who has won enough prestige in his
favorite event to attract public interest has his "price."
But he is not so much at fault as the promoter who stages
the meet in which he is a competitor.
STRICTLY BETWEEN GENTLEMEN
To illustrate what I mean, let us take the case of Mr.
Blank, who for one reason or another wants to hold an
athletic meet either for his own or someone else's
benefit. He invites school, college and club
athletes to take part in a series of events for which he
offers prizes and the opportunity to gain additional
glory. Though Mr. Blank generally succeeds in
interesting the athletes, their presence has not aroused
the enthusiasm of the public. In order to do this,
it is necessary that Mr. Blank procure one or two
nationally or internationally known champions who have the
"color" that will draw the people through the turnstiles.
So Mr. Blank goes to the champion whom he thinks is the
best bet and offers him a comparatively small "gift," in
proportion to his box-office value, to compete in the
meet. The "gift" is generally handed to the athlete
or to the athlete's representative by Mr. Blank or Mr.
Blank's trusted henchman a few minutes before the games
begin. The transaction is strictly between two
gentlemen. There is no writing of any kind nor any
checks and, unless both the promoter and the athlete
confess, there exists no proof the Amateur Athletic
Union (A. A. U. ) can use for the purpose of
professionalizing the athlete or of barring the promoter.
Sometimes the amateur champion has but recently
attained his position of popularity and is ignorant about
how affairs of this kind are conducted, in which event he
proves an easy mark for the promoter. The newcomer
generally learns very rapidly and soon finds himself where
he can dictate terms.
Fortunately for the promoter, by the time this occurs,
another athlete has arisen to take the old star's place.
Sometimes a veteran stays good for a long period and when
this occurs and the public is still interested in him, the
promoter find himself in a delicate position where he may
be forced to give the attraction the amount that he is
actually worth.
Even then, the promoter generally manages to get the
best of the deal, for though he agrees to pay the athlete
$2,000 or even $3,000 for a single night's competition,
when the hour arrives for payment, the promoter has some
bona fide excuse on tap that he produces along with two or
three hundred dollars as a "payment down" on the full
amount. Of course, the athlete never gets any more
and there is nothing that he can do about it.
Because if he exposes the promoter, he immediately bars
himself from future amateur competition. Moreover, when
the night of the meet arrives and he has not gotten his
pay, he has to go through with his running just the same.
Because the
Amateur Athletic Union
which gave the promoter the sanction for the meet in the
first place has demanded that the athletes sign an entry
blank which binds him to appear.
Very often the
Amateur Athletic Union officials have no knowledge of
what is taking place. Under the present constitution
there is no adequate way to remedy this evil and some
people are inclined to believe that no law even can
prevent the promoter from conniving with the athlete.
OUTLAW THE "WILDCAT" PROMOTER
If the Amateur Athletic Union would legislate
against the unscrupulous promoter, allowing the athlete
with a "box office name" (that is to say, the competitor
who has won an intercollegiate or national title, or who
has broken the world's record or been a member of a
Olympic team) to take part solely in the meets that
are held under
A.A.U.
supervision, the promoter would immediately fin himself
helpless. For if he did persuade the amateur
champion to compete in his "wildcat" games, the latter
would be barred from amateur ranks whether he actually
received any money or not, and that menace of the box
office would be removed.
There is the possibility that such a rule might create
a professional class in the track and field athletics.
But this is nothing to worry about, because it is a much
finer thing to be an honest professional than a dishonest
amateur.
Of course, the Amateur Athletic Union scorns
such an idea. Only public sentiment can ever bring
the A.A.U. to terms.
The colleges are by no means guiltless. If a
high-school football player is good enough, leave it to
overenthusiastic alumni to do their best to ruin him.
He senses the unfairness of the whole "amateur" system
and it cannot help but guide his impressionable mind into
the wrong channel. He often sacrifices the serious
purpose for which his parents sent him to college and he
does not even have a decent salary to compensate him for
his loss.
If you think that the boy on a championship football
team, or the amateur title-holder in track, is in the game
for the sheer fun of it you are wrong again, because it
ceases to be pleasure when you sweat three hours a day
three months of the year, working overtime in your studies
in order to continue on the gridiron.
Besides the torture of daily aches and pains and the
perpetual pounding that you get in scrimmage, which is
many times multiplied in the game itself, you have the
unceasing worry of trying to win for a fickle student
body, and the responsibility of making good before
thousands of screeching fans who have paid their money to
see you deliver. In every big sport, it is the same
thing. The sheer love of the game is overshadowed
by takes of victory that are continually being
flaunted in your face.
Your peace of mind is further menaced by the thousand
and one technicalities which are forever being raised by
amateur athletic officials, keeping you in hot water and
eventually robbing you of your effectiveness in your own
particular field of sport.
THE OLYMPIC TRYOUTS (1928)

Allow me to relate a personal experience that possibly
will give the reader a clearer insight as to what I mean.
After fourteen years of competition, I decided to try for
a place on the 1928 Olympic team. It necessitated a long period
of training to get back in running form again. After
several months of work in California and a series of races
in the South and in the East, I had reached the point
where I stood a good chance to attain my goal.
During this time I was making a series of personal
appearances with a motion picture, the theme of which was
the Olympic Games. Vague rumors came to me
that certain Amateur Athletic Union officials frowned up
this work and were doubtful as to my amateur status.
Three months before the final Olympic tryouts, a
meeting of the American Olympic Committee was held
at the New York Athletic Club, and was presided over by
the chairman,
General Douglas Mac Arthur.
After the committee had ended its session, General
Mac Arthur informed me that those present found no reason why I
should be barred and, if I did no more in the future than
I had done in the past, I would be perfectly eligible to
represent this country in the Olympic contests.
The committee also expressed the desire that I should
return to my home in California and there compete in the
sectional tryouts. Ambitious plans had been
formulated for these local games and a quote of $75,000
had been established as a goal for the Olympic
Committee of the Pacific Southwest. The chairman
of that committee,
Robert S. Weaver, of
Los Angeles, wanted to hold a special hundred-meter race
to include Frank Wykoff, the schoolboy sensation;
Charles Borah the national champion of the previous year, and myself
as a special feature of this meet.
Though it interfered with my training schedule, I went
back to California for this June 16th meet and found Charlie Borah
not well enough to run. Frankie
Wykoff, however, was very much in evidence.
In fact, I had an unobstructed view of
his back from start to finish in both the hundred and
two-hundred. The same night I started back
across the continent again for a final two weeks of work
before the Boston
(Massachusetts, USA)
tryouts.
This meet had also been extensively advertised, and the
Amateur Athletic Union
officials and the American Olympic Committee
had
exploited
the sprinters in much the same way as
Barnum & Bailey
would their paid performers. So another great
crowd was on hand when the finest group of athletes this
country has ever put on a single field went out to vie for
places on the
1928 Olympic squad.
Particularly was the competition keen in the hundred
meters. From the South had come the Dixie Flyer,
Claude Bracey of Rice Institute, as well as
Aubrey Cockrell, the champion of Texas. From the
Middle West there were George Simpson, the
sensational sprinter of Ohio State;
Fred Alderman of Michigan State, and the schoolboy
star,
Bennett; Southern California alone had sent back no
less than seven outstanding dash men, while other sections
had similarly large and representative delegations.
When we lined up for the first heat, I found myself
facing no less than four celebrated champions with only
three to qualify. There was
Henry Russell, of Cornell, who eventually made the
team;
Karl Wildermuth, of Georgetown, the national indoor
champion; Cockrell, of Texas, and
Russell Sweet
of the Olympic Club of San Francisco, who since that time
has been clocked at 9 2-5 seconds for the century.
Lawson Robertson,
the head coach of the Olympic team, was standing near the
start, and I asked him if he did not think this
competition was a trifle stiff for a first round. "Robbie"
smiled and said that his own drawings for the race had
been overruled by the
A.A.U. officials.
There was nothing which could be done, so the five of
us ran with the certainty that two sprinters at least were
sure to be eliminated.
CONFLICTING STORIES
At the end of the first half of
that race (Russell) Sweet was leading, but he
dropped back as we neared the tape and finished fourth. He
had come more than three thousand miles for less than
eleven seconds of competition. This particular heat had
found me feeling great, and I was convinced that I had run
my best. I was astonished when the time was announced as
10 4-5 seconds. Three unofficial timers whom I knew to be men of long
experience,
Dink Templeton,
the coach of Stanford University;
Feg Murray,
a former hurdling champion, and Pete Gerhardt, an old-time
sprinter, had all caught me in 10 2-5 seconds.
Right then I commenced to worry.
In the second round, George
Simpson,
Karl Wildermuth,
and I managed to qualify, which left nine men for the
semi-finals. Jimmie Quinn, the Intercollegiate champion,
Claude Bracey,
Jack Scholz,
of New York, and
myself were in the first heat. Scholz and I, having
competed in two previous Olympics, held a conference, and
decided that if we stayed in front of Quinn, we would be able to save ourselves for the
finals.
Mr. Quinn
had other plans. He was away with a glorious start and
gained so much in the first fifty yards that the rest of
us were convinced we could never catch him.
Scholz
and I were running even, with Bracey well behind. As we neared the string, I came up to
Quinn's shoulder, but could not quite overtake him. I was sure
that I had qualified.
The announcer immediately read
the results of this heat: Quinn first; Paddock
second; Bracey
third. Time 10 3-5
seconds.
The crowd was convinced that Scholz had beaten Bracey, and
roared its
disapproval of the decision. All this time the judges had
been in a huddle. Finally they called over the announcer
and gave him a new result to megaphone the crowd: Quinn first;
Scholz second; and Bracey
third.
In the other heat, Simpson and Wykoff were battling on even terms a few
meters from home when the Ohio lad pulled a muscle and
fell screaming to the track, while Mac Allister and
Russell captured the remaining places. Francis Hussey,
former schoolboy sensation of New York, was the only one
to be eliminated.
Before the finals were held, I
went to the judges and asked them if it would be possible
for me to run in the seventh lane, inasmuch as there had
been a dispute over the result of the
first semi-final heat. There was already a precedent for
such action from the games of 1924, but the officials
refused me this opportunity, claiming that it would be
unfair to Hussey,
who had finished fourth against Wykoff.
Mac Allister,
and Russell. I then went to Hussey and asked him if he was willing to
meet me in a special race, the winner to run in the
seventh lane of the
finals. Hussey agreed, but the officials again
refused.
HE SHALL NOT PASS
I realized, as did the officials,
that my best chances was in this event rather than in the
200 meters. But nothing was done, so at the end of the
first day after four hard races, I found myself as far
from making the team as I had been at the beginning.
The following afternoon we came
out for the 200 and the suspicions which had been already
awakened were definitely confirmed by the seeding of the
second-round heats. Only two men were to be selected in each
race, instead of the customary three, and I found myself
facing Bracey of Texas, and Roland Locke, the world's record holder for this
distance.
It meant that the three of us
would leave our best on the track in the semi-final
instead of in the last round. The two who did weather
this race would have nothing left with which to save off
the efforts of comparatively fresh men later on. I had
the additional disadvantage of being convinced that, if I
did not win this race by a clear margin, I probably would
be overlooked by the judges as on the previous day.
Fortunately for Locke
and myself, Claude Bracey was too weary from
qualifying in the 100 meters to show his best form and we
old-timers got in.
Borah won the finals, after a
magnificent race in which he came from behind in the final fifty
to finish with a wonderful burst of speed. I was second;
Scholz
was third; and Harry Cummings,
of Virginia University, nosed out Locke
for the fourth position.
No sooner had my faith in human
nature been re-established,
than I commenced to hear those old, vague rumors about my
amateur status being in question. That night the
A.A.U. selection
committee met to name the team, which in past years has been no more than a
clerical job, as the first four winners in each event had
been automatically selected in a few minutes' time. On
this occasion, four hours slipped away, and the committee
was still in session, and when they finally did disband,
the refused to give out any kind of an account of what had
taken place.
About three o'clock in the
morning, Bryan Field,
of the New York Times, called me on the phone, and said: "I am sending
in a story to my paper that you have been removed from the
Olympic team after a long period of discussion. Now I
want you to see if you can verify this."
I immediately got Bob Weaver,
our Western representative on the selection committee, on
the phone and said ..."I
don't think it was right for you to throw me off the team
without at
least giving me a hearing." Mr. Weaver replied that the committee, after taking
such action, had agreed to keep the entire proceeding
secret for forty-eight hours (which would make it too late
for anything to be done before the team sailed). But Mr. Weaver
requested that I see him at once.
It was a long story that Weaver told me of what
had taken place in the committee room that night, and it
all simmered down to this -- that Gustavus T. Kirby, whose word had long been recognized as law in both the
Intercollegiate Amateur
Athletic Association of America and the
Amateur Athletic Union,
before sailing as the advance man of the Olympic team,
had been firm in one point, namely, that under no
circumstances should I be included as a member of the
team. Kirby's
henchmen had battled for hours to carry out his wishes,
and it had been finally recommended to chairman General Douglas MacArthur
that I be left at home.
It became evident enough on
investigation that the
A.A.U. had figured I was through as a sprinter early
in the spring of 1928, and would never make the
Olympic team. However, the officials felt
that what speed I yet retained could still be cashed in
upon at both Los Angeles and Boston tryouts though I would
not be able to run fast enough to cause them any trouble.
Even if I did qualify, they might
easily overlook me in the Boston heats. They could always
rule me out as a last resort - but here they had reckoned
without the intervention of General MacArthur, who was not an A.A.U.
representative but an
Army man, drafted for the chairmanship of the American Olympic Committee.
It so happened that the general was short on knowledge of
how the wheels within the wheels of the A.A.U.
turn, but long on justice, and "he saw no reason why a man who
had been judged eligible to compete in the tryouts should
not be just as eligible to take part in the Olympic
Games."
THE AFTERMATH OF
VICTORY
This attitude of General MacArthur,
abetted by a reminder of a decision that the
American Olympic Committee
had made three months
previously, to the effect that if I did nothing more than
I had already done I would still be an amateur, led to my
re-instatement twenty-four hours before the team sailed.
All this bickering had nothing to
do with my own dismal showing at Amsterdam,
because I was hardened to it by this time, having gone
through several other equally discouraging sieges in the
past years such as Ray Barbuti, underwent this spring, and
Arthur Duffey,
Mel Sheppard, Charles Hoff,
Paavo Nurmi and
Jole Ray faced in former years. Though I cannot erase those
unpleasant memories from my own mind, I trust that no son
of mine will ever be an amateur champion, for even if he does not suffer from
similar experiences, he will have the discouraging
aftermath of victory to face, no matter in what sport he
happens to be the leading figure.
END
Other pages featuring Charley Paddock
|